Added “Incorrect Diagnosis” article today criticizing the focus on pharmaceutical drugs as the solution to psychological problems. This is something I’ve been upset about for most of my adult life. It drives me crazy that the drug industry, what we politely call “psychoactive pharmaceutical companies,” has been able to pull the wool over quite intelligent people that the solution to being “psychologically healthy” is to take “medication” in the form of their latest chemical concoction. What drives me even crazier is that a lot of intelligent people stop even thinking about life at all psychologically, at all in terms of the their own personalities, at all in terms of their actual relationships between others, at all in terms of emotional past experiences.
I’ve encountered this frequently in teaching psychology. I’ll suggest something might have to do with past or current emotional interactions, say, between parent and child — and a student will comment, “Yeh, but isn’t it all really chemicals anyway? Isn’t it just the way we’re wired, you know, genetics and all?” Generally most people in the class agree with this comment.
There’s something insidious about this way of thinking. It stops you thinking about how things are connected, how your feelings now are connected with other feelings, whether in memory or happening at this point in one’s life. Anyway, that’s another topic that will come up a bit down the road.
Check out “Incorrect Diagnosis” and see what you think.
I’ve posted the first two articles criticizing psychology for its ignoring conscious experience and personal choice as crucial elements of understanding ourselves.
I have begun putting essays out there. Strictly speaking, this blog is intended to help readers follow what has been added or changed recently rather than being a steady flow of off-the-cuff ideas. The ideas are contained in the “chapters,” beginning with the Introduction section. This currently contains three chapters. The first is an overview of the core ideas of the blook. (“Blook” because it’s similar to blog but organized as chapters in a logical sequence rather than unedited observations in time sequence. I thought for a while that I’d coined the term, until I googled it and found out it had been around for quite a while and that there was even a Blook Prize for the best blook! Oh, well…) The second is a quick “disclaimer” you might say. The third lays out some central ideas that have guided the writing of this over the ten or twenty years I’ve been at it.
The first essays I’ve added to the main body of the blook are two on creativity. The first focuses on the urgency of the need for creativity throughout life and the obstacles to it within our culture.
The next set of essays are about psychology. Mostly what’s wrong with psychology as most people understand it today. I’ve got many articles in this section and what I’ve put out there so far is just an initial one.
There will be a section after this about community. This will focus on The Fourth Wall / Sullivan Institute, a cult-ish community I belonged to for more than twenty years. I’ve found writing about this experience to be extremely difficult. I’ve got a couple essays completed, but want to review them before posting.
Then, following this expanding circle from the individual to the societal, are two articles on the struggle for socialism in South America. So far I’ve just posted an article I wrote in 2005 and its translation into Spanish, as published in Punto Final, an excellent bi-weekly publication in Chile. I will soon post my more recent article, published this year in several journals in Chile and Argentina, in both English and Spanish versions.
Finally, not to be daunted by my own ignorance, I have what I consider a little fun exploring my own agnosticism. Nothing posted yet, just need to do a little more editing before this goes out.
This is a test (of my blog). This is only a test. Had this been a real first post, you would have been advised to duck under your desk, bury your head between knees, and kiss your ass goodbye!